Plato’s Unwritten Doctrines from a Hermeneutical Point of View* :: Philosophy Philosophical dialogue Essays

Platos Unwritten Doctrines from a Hermeneutical Point of View* get up In this paper, I pass on show the deep roots of negotiation in Platos pattern, in order to examine the validity of the questionable esoteric Plato. The confrontation between dialogicity and unwritten doctrines is the main theme of this article. These ii views Hermeneutics and Tbingen School are non far away on concrete contents, with more or less variations. only it must be noticed that both conceptions of Platonic thinking are contradictory and that is reflected in their commentarys of Platos own philosophical project.To begin with, I will not compare each point of the Hermeneutic and Tubingen School positions. I will explain, so far as I can understand, why the explanation of the Tbingen School is unsatisfactory. (1) These insufficiencies are not related to its deep abridgment of the Platonic oral tradition, only to its interpretation. (2) The question is wholly hermeneutical and refers to the pretens ion, extension and take account that this oral doctrine can have in Platonic philosophy.I will avoid the content questions, because they are far away from the direct of this paper. The implicit question in these two trends is the following can Platos own philosophy be reduced to a metaphysical strategy? (3) The affirmative answer to that question holds the whole account of the Tbingen School. But I consider that this assumption is not correct and that it supposes the projection of strange elements to Platonic philosophy. And my task in this contri scarcelyion is to show why.Platos thought has two axes thematical and formal. Thematic exclusivelyy it moves around the Good, and formally, around the dialectic. Both themes are the groundwork of his whole work and the ideas are not more than the attempt of link them. The dialectical access to ideas is fully congruous with the question of the Good, at all levels. This is clearly exposed in the beginning of Philebus, (4) where it is n ecessary to reach the virtue about the good through parley, with all required efforts. But dialogue is not a combat between enemies to win ace position, but the battle between allies supporting the truth.Dialectic is not other thing than the ability to guide a conversation, that is, the capability to dialogue. (5) Because of that, language exactly (6) has no secondary position in Platos philosophy. Even one of his works is wholly dedicated to that theme Cratylus , and there it can be seen that language is neither pure nature nor complete artifact.