The Good, the Bad, and ‘the Daily Show’ Reading Analysis

Analysis of The Good, The Bad, and The Daily maneuver In Jason Zinsers The Good, the Bad, andThe Daily plant his purpose was to formulate a response to the uncertainty regarding the legitimacy and ethics of bogus news sources. Zinser begins by discussing if it is acceptable to obtain information from a humorous and often sarcastic news source (in this exemplar,The Daily Show), he points out that the question isnt whether Jon Stewart or the shows producers and writers are morally corrupt people, precisely whether or not fake news is, on the whole, beneficial or damaging to society (Zinser 363-364).In other words, he begs the question, can we actually be an aware public that can contribute, comprehend, and playction as a commonwealth through the projections of a fake news source? Zinser then makes the assume that fake news causes two vices, the first being deception due to the lack of valuing objectivity in their reports. The second is dilution, both in the shade of media from the variance of online sources as well as adding excessive news reports attracting to a greater extent viewing audience to what is typically a hard news source.Zinser also reminds us of the beneficial aspects in fake news. Empirical data suggests a expressive style that either viewers of The Daily Showare better informed than those watching hard news because of its effectiveness, or, on the other hand that it attracts viewers who already know about the current events being discussed, evidence of its success.The noble-minded solution, he concludes, would be to merge the two, retaining the power and persuasion ofThe Daily Showas well as including depth and insight more unmixed in hard news reports, helping viewers understand distinct sides of the arguments present (Zinser 371). When diving into Zinsers writing, some similar aspects from George Orwells, Politics in the English Language came to mind. Orwell states, foolish thoughts, being a result of wrangle, run-in has beco me a result of foolish thoughts.Vagueness is the most evident feature of speech of the English prose. There is a lack of imagery and the figurative language no longer gives a connection to images and concrete thoughts. When comparing this to the satirical writing and language that Zinser speaks of in The Good, The Bad, and The Daily Show it creates a utter(a) picture of how by exemplifying the two vices, (deception and dilution) misconceptions can easily happen, particularly when your only news source is a satirical fake ews source. When cerebration about some of the other fake news sources, one example that might be overlooked is The Onion a very familiar source from which the stories are based on fact but written in a humorous and satirical way. Being that The Onion makes fun of all different types of news events from health issues to sports, The Onion actually delves into manifold aspects of our culture in a comical way but soothe delivering facts and informing people ab out what is going on in the world.In this lineament it can be just as influential as real news. In fact an example of The Onions influential satirical news was captured when they produce the worlds sexiest man and posted Kim Jong Un (the North Korean Dictator) as the sexiest man alive. North Korea took it serious and published it in their local motif and made a big deal out of it (news. yahoo. com). It is in this very(prenominal) sense that is described in Zinsers analysis of this so called fake news that you can get an idea of the actual influence this has on our culture.