Parents held responsible for childrens crime Essay

Parents travelling bag a lot of responsibility when raising youngsterren. They are there to school them right from improper and how to behave in order to raise them into self-made men and women that todays society can relate to or else than juvenile delinquents that this world discriminates upon. It is the parents responsibility to instill determine into their young children because as the children grow it becomes their responsibility to moderate their own decisions since ane day they will have to face the real world on their own.So I believe parents should not be held accountable for their childrens actions because blaming parents is not pass to help children learn from their mistakes. Advocates who subscribe to full paternal accountability stated, They believe parents should know about and control their childrens actions and consider their obligation to bear the consequences of their childrens mistakes. By this comment theyre stating that parents basically deserve every penalization their children commit. However, parents shouldnt be incarcerated for their childrens wrong doings, the child themselves are responsible for the offensives they committed. They deserve to pay the price for the actions they take.If children did the villainy then the most reasonable explanation would be that they pay the price. Blaming parents isnt going to help the children learn from their mistakes, its just going to make it that much easier for them to commit the crime again without getting any punishment sent their way. When it comes to parents some may be the best when it comes to raising their children, provided their child decide to go down a different racecourse with the wrong crowd and completely misbehave.That doesnt mean that the parents should be punish for the childs mistakes. Parents instill rules upon their children and have high expectations for them. However, many children in todays society are easily findd by multitude in their surroundings. So, b y attacking the parents the problem isnt going to transport and the situation isnt going to get any easier. The vicious hound dog analogy that states, Parents should control a child just as an owner should control a dog is not a reasonable statement. I fully agree with the author Sylvia Miller. Children are not animals nor should they be treat manage animals.They dont deserve to be controlled like a pet. By controlling a child and keeping them enclosed like a pet, is only going to make matters worse and the child is going to rebel. A parent has to lay down supervision and care for their children, unless arent responsible for everyaction the child makes. If we continue to satanic parents for their childrens crimes, then we will see no positive outcomes in the childs future. Parents cant control their children only influence them.If a parent continues to try to participate in a childs life and that child continues to rebel. It is therefore not the parents fault of the crime tha t child commits. It is up to the children to follow the rules that their parents established for them in order to weather a successful life.