Differences Between the North and South that Led to the Civil War Essay

The siemensern and northmostern states varied on many issues, which last led them to the complaisant War. There were deep economic, social, and political differences between the North and the South. These differences stemmed from the interpretation of the United States Constitution on both sides. In the end, all of these disagreements about the rights of states led to the Civil War. There were reasons other than bondage for the South?s secession. The manifestations of division in America were many Utopian communities, conflicts over public space, backlash against immigrants, urban riots, black protest, and Indian opponent (Norton 234). America was a divided land in quest cleanse with the South in the most need. The South relied heavily on agriculture, as opposed to the North, which was highly populated and an industrialized society. The South grew cotton, which was its main property crop and many southerlyers k in the altogether that heavy reliance on slave press would hurt the South eventually, but their warnings were non heeded. The South was based on a totalitarian system.Constitutionally the North favored a undefendable interpretation of the United States Constitution, and they wanted to grant the federal government increase powers. The South wanted to reserve all undefined powers to the individual states themselves. The South relied upon slave labor for their economic well being, and the economy of the North was not reliant on such labor or in need of this type of service. This main issue overshadowed all others. Southerners compared slavery to the wage-slave system of the North, and believed their slaves authoritative better care than the northern factory workers received from their employers. Many Southern preachers proclaimed that slavery was sanctioned in the Bible. Southern leaders had evermore tried to seek new areas into which slavery might be drawn-out (Oates 349).After the American Revolution, slavery began to decre ase in the North, plainly as it was becoming more popular in the South. By the turn of the century, cardinal of the most Northern states had abolished slavery. During this date, a surge of democratic reform brush the North to the West, and there were demands for political equality, economic and social advances for all Americans. Northerners verbalise that slavery revoked the human right of being a free soulfulness and when new territories became available i... ...in opinion. We should remember the long sacrifices our fellow citizens made during this time and appreciate their actions or endeavors. Especially that of Abraham Lincoln. The best way to assess the assess of Lincoln is to think what the condition of American would be in at present if he had never lived or never been President (Whitman 262).Yes, slavery was the pull in of the Civil War, half of the country thought it was wrong, and the other half just could not let it go or continue. The war was fought over all in different places, and the monetary and property loss cannot be calculated. Arguments about the causes and consequences of the Civil War, as well as the reasons for Northern victory, will continue as long as there are historians to wield the pen ? which is, mayhap even for this bloody conflict, mightier than the sword (Oates 388). The Civil War was a great waste in terms of human life and possible execution and should be considered shameful. Before its first centennial, tragedy struck a new country and altered it for an eternity. It will never be forgotten, but ruin builds strength and the United States of America is now a much stronger race (Oates 388).