The Suez Crisis Of 1956 Essay -- Arab-Israeli Conflict History Arabs I

The Suez Crisis of 1956IntroductionAmong the most important foundations in the move Arab-Israeliconflict was the seeds that were sown in the aftermath of the 1956 SinaiCampaign, or the Suez Crisis. Whatever the function is referred to as, itsconsequences involving two relations internal to the Middle East and with theworld are impossible to ignore. Looked at simply as an objective event inhistory, one could note several key outcomes of the war. It marked thebeginning of the prohibit of British and French colonial leadership in the region,and the start of an increasingly high American and Soviet involvement. The waralso proved to the Arab nations of the field of view that the Israeli military machinewas not one to be interpreted lightly, a lesson which would be forgotten and retaughtin the 1967 Six Day fight. The positive impact that the United Nations wouldhave on ending the conflict, done Canadas idea of creating a UN peacekeepingforce to help enforce the ceasefire, was som e other important outcome.This paper, however, get out not have the goal of examining these specificevents in relation to the war, nor volition it try to determine which performers weremost significant. My aim will be to gain a more complete understanding of the feeling of the crisis by reviewing key events of the war from two differentperspectives the Israeli and the Arab points of view, nonnegative the experiences ofthe European powers as well. Through a brief comparison of both the coverage ofthe War by the differing authors and the varying interpretations seen throughoutmy study, I will be best able to make an informed evaluation on how the eventwas, and is today, seen in the political and historical forum.Comparison of CoverageThe war, which was begun on October 29, 1956 when the Israelis movedtheir units into the Sinai peninsula, has had its origins traced back to manyhistorical events. Which is the most important of these is a point of contentionfor the authors I have stu died. There does seem to be for all parties involveda consensus that the ascent to power of Gamal Abdel Nasser to President of Eqyptin 1956 , and his move to nationalize the Suez Canal as the main precipitatingfactor in setting off the conflict.Why Nasser did this, however, is wheremy various sources diverge.Quite predictably, sources use from... ...tter idea of how the Egyptian army forcesviewed and dealt with the crisis.To help in a world-wide rounding of the Israeli view of the crisis, I used Yitzak Shamirsautobiography (Shamir, Yitzhak Summing Up London Weidenfeld and NicolsonPress 1994.), a man who was to play an integral region in the Arab-Israeliconflict as the Prime Minister of Israel in the 1980s. My seem for an Israeli military perspective was preferably arduous, but finally colonized on the work of Chaim Herzog in The Arab-Israeli Wars (1982). As Herzog was a major-general in the crisis of 1956, he not only provided me with detailed information of theinvasion itself , but of the various meanings and causes behind it. In trying to find Jewish academic sources, I eventually settled on the works of Itamar Rabinovichs Seven Wars and One calm Treaty (1991), and M.E. Yapps The Near East Since the First World War (1991). turn Rabinovich was based in Tel Aviv and hadstronger pro-Israeli views, Yapp, who was a professor in London, England, whosideas were a runty more moderate and yet, at least in this authors perspective,seemed to lean quite distinctly towards the Jewish States cause.